Europe is excited about a possible President Barack Obama. This is something they did not think was possible, after all it has been shoved down their throats for decades what an unfair and racist society America is. Another thing shoved down their throats is that President Bush is the most evil, arrogant, violent, stupid, imperialistic and greedy man in the world.
Enter Obama stage-left politically, or so Europe hopes. Here’s the guy that is going to fix it all. He’s going to pull out of Iraq, he’s going to be Mr. Environmentalist, he's going to be some kind of new American Socialist. (What’s funny about this is that now that Bush is leaving most of Europe has conservative governments). They think he is just going to toe the line on what the world wants.
In Madrid recently, I had a conversation with a Spanish friend who was going on about Obama’s ethnicity and rumored (incorrectly) religious beliefs. He was describing him as black, as maybe Muslim, as a minority, just as “different”. So I told him, “You’re forgetting one thing. Above all that - he’s an American.”
I think Europe could be making the same mistake. If they think there is going to be some huge sea change in American policy due to an Obama presidency – they’re wrong. There will be changes of course. But there is no way he’s going to bail on Iraq immediately, he is already basically saying as much. There is no way he won’t continue in Afghanistan. He is not going to suddenly stop the fight against terrorism. He already voted for Bush’s renewal of the FISA electronic surveillance bill, the same goes for economic policies, etc. Obama has started his inevitable move toward the political center so he can get elected.
So in short, I’m expecting a nice honeymoon period for Barack Obama in Europe right after he’s elected. He will be seen as being able to do no wrong, as somehow just not like those other Presidents. Then there will be the gradual realization, issue by issue, that things really haven’t changed too much – just the packaging has.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Europe is going to miss George W. Bush. Now there was a guy everyone could agree on hating. Judging a book by it’s cover is just so much easier than reading it. George Bush's book cover was clear - Republican, white, rich kid, etc. Obama's cover looks easy to judge also - but is it?
2 comments:
Excellent observation: "Judging a book by it’s cover is just so much easier than reading it."
My experience in Europe and from reading/listening to Spanish and English media is that there's a high level of naïveté among Europeans regarding Obama. It's laughable how much they're expecting U.S. foreign policy to change if Obama gets elected. Give me a break. Stay the course and pass the ammo, will be more like it.
What ails the U.S. and the world cannot be fixed in the first 100 days of a new administration. One hundred years, maybe, but not 100 days.
The whole anti-Bush, "anybody but Bush" sentiment is so strong, both in the U.S. and overseas, that people are tripping over themselves to coronate the next POTUS. But here's the irony: Without Bush, there is no Obama.
Obama made it to the head of the pack because of Bush, because he was so dramatically different on all levels (race, social class,family background, age, political experience, etc.) from all the other candidates. It's like American Idol for politicians. The public wants a fresh, new face.
If Bush's time in office had not been such an abject failure on all fronts, domestic and international, there's no way that Obama would've become his party's nominee in 2008.
Have you heard of the history and politics podcasts ("Hardcore History" and "Common Sense") by this guy named Dan Carlin? They're excellent. You should give them a listen sometime, especially his recent "Common Sense" episodes where he gives his opinions about the broken U.S. political system and Obama's candidacy. (www.dancarlin.com)
Thanks Bilingual, I'll check that out.
Post a Comment